Distinctive Features of Short‐Term Psychodynamic‐Interpersonal Psychotherapy: A Review of the Comparative Psychotherapy Process Literature
By M. Blagys, M. Hilsenroth. 2006
342 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Clinical Psychology, General Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/671fcbdbcb1c031c23fa6ae570b343c2af5d41fa
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Clinical Psychology
In General Psychology
Citations in the corpus
- The efficacy of psychodynamic psychotherapy. (2010, methodology): “Blagys and Hilsenroth (2000) conducted a search of the PsycLit database to identify empirical studies that compared the process and technique of manualized psychodynamic therapy with that of manualized cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT).”
- A programmatic study of short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy: Assessment, process, outcome, and training (2007, methodology): “The scale we developed is based on two reviews of the comparative psychotherapy process literature (Blagys & Hilsenroth, 2000 , 2002 ) that sought to identify core features used in PI (defined broadly to include psychodynamic, PI, and interpersonal therapies) and CB (defined broadly to include cog”
- Relational-cultural therapy: Theory, research, and application to counseling competencies. (2013, background): “For instance, therapeutic interventions focused on affect and emotional expression, interpersonal relations, and identification of traumatic and/or troubling life experiences (Blagys & Hilsenroth, 2000) are descriptive of both psychodynamic and RCT practice.”