Subspace-search variational quantum eigensolver for excited states

By Ken M. Nakanishi, Kosuke Mitarai, Keisuke Fujii. Physical Review Research, 2018

311 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The variational quantum eigensolver (VQE), a variational algorithm to obtain an approximated ground state of a given Hamiltonian, is an appealing application of near-term quantum computers. The original work [A. Peruzzo et al.; \textit{Nat. Commun.}; \textbf{5}, 4213 (2014)] focused only on finding a ground state, whereas the excited states can also induce interesting phenomena in molecules and materials. Calculating excited states is, in general, a more difficult task than finding ground states for classical computers. To extend the framework to excited states, we here propose an algorithm, the subspace-search variational quantum eigensolver (SSVQE). This algorithm searches a low energy subspace by supplying orthogonal input states to the variational ansatz and relies on the unitarity of transformations to ensure the orthogonality of output states. The $k$-th excited state is obtained as the highest energy state in the low energy subspace. The proposed algorithm consists only of two parameter optimization procedures and does not employ any ancilla qubits. The disuse of the ancilla qubits is a great improvement from the existing proposals for excited states, which have utilized the swap test, making our proposal a truly near-term quantum algorithm. We further generalize the SSVQE to obtain all excited states up to the $k$-th by only a single optimization procedure. From numerical simulations, we verify the proposed algorithms. This work greatly extends the applicable domain of the VQE to excited states and their related properties like a transition amplitude without sacrificing any feasibility of it.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/67113b975f45179848605ad60f7cf30379166c54

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Patrick J. Coles
  2. M. Cerezo
  3. Lukasz Cincio
  4. Suguru Endo
  5. Andrew Arrasmith
  6. Jarrod R. McClean
  7. Simon C. Benjamin
  8. Josh A. Izaac

In Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics

  1. Patrick J. Coles
  2. M. Cerezo
  3. Lukasz Cincio
  4. Suguru Endo
  5. Simon C. Benjamin
  6. Jarrod R. McClean
  7. Xiao Yuan
  8. Ryan Babbush

Citations in the corpus