Effort during visual search and counting: Insights from pupillometry

By G. Porter, Tom Troscianko, Iain D. Gilchrist. 2007

259 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Neuroscience

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Xavier Giró-i-Nieto

Citations in the corpus

• Recurrent Neural Networks for Semantic Instance Segmentation (2017, background): “In this paper, we argue that both ranking thousands of object-prominent regions [17, 18, 24, 23, 11, 19] or decomposing the problem into two independent modules [6, 12, 34] are unnatural approaches that are far away from the sequential exploration that we as humans follow to solve related tasks such”
• Safe and sensible preprocessing and baseline correction of pupil-size data (2018, unknown): “…& Kapoula, 2011; Knapen et al., 2016; Koelewijn, Zekveld, Festen, & Kramer, 2012; e.g. Laeng & Sulutvedt, 2014; Murphy, Moort, & Nieuwenhuis, 2016; Porter, Troscianko, & Gilchrist, 2007; Privitera, Renninger, Carney, Klein, & Aguilar, 2010) seem somewhat more common than variations of divisive…”