TESTS OF THE MID-DOMAIN HYPOTHESIS: A REVIEW OF THE EVIDENCE

102 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

SESAM – a new framework integrating macroecological and species distribution models for predicting spatio‐temporal patterns of species assemblages (2011, methodology): “These approaches have been widely used in the last two decades (e.g. Pausas & Austin, 2001; Currie et al., 2004; Thuiller et al., 2006; Rahbek et al., 2007; Currie & Kerr, 2008; Algar et al., 2009).”
Ecological and Evolutionary Drivers of Geographic Variation in Species Diversity (2015, unknown): “…randomly No prediction No prediction No prediction Time (R, M) Rejected (R, M) More time to diversify No prediction No prediction No prediction Abbreviations: C, Currie & Kerr 2008; M, Mittelbach et al. 2007; P, Pianka 1966; R, Rohde 1992; W, Willig et al. 2003. and genetic diversity (Figure 1).”
Adapting to climate change: a perspective from evolutionary physiology (2010, background): “The GSM makes relatively few assumptions, as do models of geometric constraints (see Currie & Kerr 2008) and, at least from a ‘first order perspective’, as does the metabolic theory of ecology (Brown et al. 2004).”
Seasonality, the latitudinal gradient of diversity, and Eocene insects (2010, result): “…diversity patterns, or including longitude as well as latitude, the hypothesis produces many equivocal or contradictory results, and some of its assumptions appear problematic (Bokma et al. 2001; Zapata et al. 2003, 2005, references therein; but see Colwell et al. 2004a; Currie and Kerr 2008).”