Corporations, Classes, and Social Movements After Managerialism

By Gerald F. Davis, Doug McAdam. 2000

132 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/66d55704be6abfe2cfe3006e991927819e16eec9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. Tim Bartley
2. John L. Campbell
3. Justin Tan
4. M. Kaptein
5. Danuta de Grosbois
6. J. Moon

In Sociology and Political Science

1. John L. Campbell
2. C. Child
3. Tim Bartley

Citations in the corpus

• Collective action and market formation: An integrative framework (2018, unknown): “(Davis and McAdam, 2000; Fligstein, 2001; Rao et al., 2000).”
• Shaming the Corporation (2014, background): “These changes were rooted in various ways in deregulation, the liberalization of trade, the supply chain revolution, and a shareholder value movement that emphasized outsourcing (Davis and McAdam 2000; Gereffi, Humphrey, and Sturgeon 2005).”
• Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? an institutional theory of corporate social responsibility (2007, background): “Such shareholder activism has been described as a new kind of social movement that may affect the degree to which corporations act in socially responsible ways (Davis & McAdam, 2000; Davis & Thompson, 1994; Maignan & Ralston, 2002: 498).”