Embedding Local Places in Global Spaces: Geographical Indications as a Territorial Development Strategy

By Sarah Bowen. 2010

239 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Plant Science, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/66d16c46d974fb9d56f773d17ee652f93b0d6f8f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Plant Science

1. J. Touzard
2. Mara Giua
3. G. Belletti
4. Fabrizio de Filippis
5. C. Vaquero‐Piñeiro
6. R. Crescenzi
7. A. Marescotti

In Strategy and Management

1. J. Touzard
2. G. Belletti
3. R. Crescenzi
4. A. Marescotti

Citations in the corpus

• Geographical Indications and local development: the strength of territorial embeddedness (2021, background): “The majority of these contributions focus on specific case studies and adopt qualitative approaches (e.g., Belletti et al., 2015; Bowen, 2010), such as interviews, desk research and figure comparisons (Bowen & Zapata, 2009; Dogan & Gokovali, 2012; Tregear et al., 2007).”
• Geographical Indications, Public Goods, and Sustainable Development: The Roles of Actors’ Strategies and Public Policies (2017, background): “GI legal protection strengthens these effects by means of product specifications, generating a territorial anchor for the production process that differs in strength depending on the rules, for example, stating or not stating that a GI product should be processed inside the delimited area (Bowen, 20”