An Empirical Evaluation of doc2vec with Practical Insights into Document Embedding Generation

By Jey Han Lau, Timothy Baldwin. 2016

708 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Recently, Le and Mikolov (2014) proposed doc2vec as an extension to word2vec (Mikolov et al., 2013a) to learn document-level embeddings. Despite promising results in the original paper, others have struggled to reproduce those results. This paper presents a rigorous empirical evaluation of doc2vec over two tasks. We compare doc2vec to two baselines and two state-of-the-art document embedding methodologies. We found that doc2vec performs robustly when using models trained on large external corpora, and can be further improved by using pre-trained word embeddings. We also provide recommendations on hyper-parameter settings for general purpose applications, and release source code to induce document embeddings using our trained doc2vec models.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Natural Language Processing, Representation & Self-Supervised Learning

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Hinrich Schütze
  2. Graham Neubig
  3. Mohit Bansal
  4. Yinfei Yang
  5. Iryna Gurevych
  6. Daniel Matthew Cer
  7. Luke S. Zettlemoyer
  8. Percy Liang

In Natural Language Processing

  1. Hinrich Schütze
  2. Daniel Matthew Cer
  3. Yinfei Yang
  4. Iryna Gurevych
  5. Graham Neubig
  6. Jimmy J. Lin
  7. John Wieting
  8. Nils Reimers

In Representation & Self-Supervised Learning

  1. Yinfei Yang
  2. Daniel Matthew Cer
  3. Hinrich Schütze
  4. Nina Poerner
  5. Rowan Hall Maudslay
  6. Iñigo Lopez-Gazpio
  7. Yueting Zhuang
  8. Peng Hu

Citations in the corpus