Static and Dynamic Scaling Relations for Earthquakes and Their Implications for Rupture Speed and Stress Drop

202 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A new spectral ratio method using narrow band coda envelopes: Evidence for non‐self‐similarity in the Hector Mine sequence (2007, background): “However, it has been proposed by Kanamori and Rivera [2004] that the scaling between moment and corner frequency could take on the form,”
Earthquake magnitude estimation from peak amplitudes of very early seismic signals on strong motion records (2006, background): “More recently, Beeler et al. [2003] observe that apparent stress and Brune’ stress drop co-vary with magnitude in the moment range 1010–1015 Nm. Kanamori and Rivera [2004] , using a wider moment range data set (1010 � Mo � 10 19 Nm) conclude that static stress drop and rupture velocity can scale di”
Earthquake source scaling and self-similarity estimation by stacking P and S spectra (2004, unknown): “The standard formula [e.g., Aki and Richards, 1980; Kanamori and Rivera, 2004 ] for the moment in this case is”
Earthquakes as multiscale dynamic ruptures with heterogeneous fracture surface energy (2005, background): “example, the ratio between seismically radiated energy Es and seismic moment Mo is constant or depends only weakly on size [e.g., Ide and Beroza, 2001; Ide et al., 2003; Kanamori and Rivera, 2004].”