The access of business interests to EU institutions: towards élite pluralism?

By R. Eising. 2007

216 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Political Science and International Relations, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/66ced93f7a394149f0c891af944e3658d02da19b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Political Science and International Relations

1. Adriana Bunea
2. D. Coen
3. C. Mitchell
4. J. Beyers
5. Caelesta Braun
6. N. Dubash

In Strategy and Management

1. Adriana Bunea
2. D. Coen
3. C. Mitchell
4. Shunsuke Managi
5. J. Beyers
6. Caelesta Braun
7. Adam B. Jaffe
8. N. Dubash

Citations in the corpus

• Pressure and Expertise: Explaining the Information Supply of Interest Groups in EU Legislative Lobbying (2016, unknown): “Legal information includes the administrative and legal constraints regarding a certain policy, such as its compatibility with former treaties and existing legislation (Eising, 2007).”
• Ties that count: explaining interest group access to policymakers (2013, background): “…to provide interest group access (Poppelaars 2009b; Braun 2012) and earlier research on how different types of expertise 116 B E Y E R S A N D B R A U N are needed in order to obtain access to different EU officials (Beyers 2002; Bouwen 2002; Eising 2004, 2007; Beyers and Kerremans 2012).”
• National and Sub-national Policies and Institutions (2014, background): “Three factors have been considered important for lobbying success in policy design namely: how 7 institutions shape the space for participation (Kohler-Koch and Finke, 2007), organizational 8 resources (Eising, 2007), and the policy environment (Mahoney, 2008; Coen and Richardson, 2009).”
• Empirical and theoretical studies in EU lobbying (2007, background): “In such a complex policy process it is vital that future studies no longer focus on lobbying in single institutional venues, but instead attempt to tackle the difficult comparative study of interest strategies across different institutional levels (Beyers and Kerremans 2007; Eising 2007).”
• Issues, preferences and ties: determinants of interest groups' preference attainment in the EU environmental policy (2013, background): “Structural characteristics such as membership size (Eising 2007), internal organization (Dür 2008a) or the advocate type also affect lobbying success.”