Comments on the Stress-Energy Tensor Operator in Curved Spacetime

By Valter Moretti. 2001

154 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Abstract: The technique based on a *-algebra of Wick products of field operators in curved spacetime, in the local covariant version proposed by Hollands and Wald, is strightforwardly generalized in order to define the stress-energy tensor operator in curved globally hyperbolic spacetimes. In particular, the locality and covariance requirement is generalized to Wick products of differentiated quantum fields. Within the proposed formalism, there is room to accomplish all of the physical requirements provided that known problems concerning the conservation of the stress-energy tensor are assumed to be related to the interface between the quantum and classical formalism. The proposed stress-energy tensor operator turns out to be conserved and reduces to the classical form if field operators are replaced by classical fields satisfying the equation of motion. The definition is based on the existence of convenient counterterms given by certain local Wick products of differentiated fields. These terms are independent from the arbitrary length scale (and any quantum state) and they classically vanish on solutions of the Klein-Gordon equation. Considering the averaged stress-energy tensor with respect to Hadamard quantum states, the presented definition turns out to be equivalent to an improved point-splitting renormalization procedure which makes use of the nonambiguous part of the Hadamard parametrix only that is determined by the local geometry and the parameters which appear in the Klein-Gordon operator. In particular, no extra added-by-hand term gαβQ and no arbitrary smooth part of the Hadamard parametrix (generated by some arbitrary smooth term ``ω0'') are involved. The averaged stress-energy tensor obtained by the point-splitting procedure also coincides with that found by employing the local ζ-function approach whenever that technique can be implemented.

Subfields: Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/66cdcbf11bbce22156e1a45f4408b7ebf03770cf

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics

  1. S. Hollands
  2. R. Wald
  3. Igor Khavkine
  4. Valter Moretti

In Nuclear and High Energy Physics

  1. S. Hollands
  2. R. Wald
  3. Igor Khavkine
  4. Valter Moretti
  5. K. Fredenhagen
  6. K. Rejzner
  7. D. Marolf
  8. S. Ross

In Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

  1. S. Hollands
  2. R. Wald
  3. Igor Khavkine
  4. Valter Moretti
  5. K. Fredenhagen
  6. K. Rejzner
  7. D. Marolf
  8. S. Ross

Citations in the corpus