THE STELLAR POPULATION STRUCTURE OF THE GALACTIC DISK

By Jo Bovy, Hans-Walter Rix, Edward F. Schlafly, D. Nidever, J. Holtzman, M. Shetrone, Timothy C. Beers. 2015

137 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The spatial structure of stellar populations with different chemical abundances in the Milky Way (MW) contains a wealth of information on Galactic evolution over cosmic time. We use data on 14,699 red-clump stars from the APOGEE survey, covering , to determine the structure of mono-abundance populations (MAPs)—stars in narrow bins in and —accounting for the complex effects of the APOGEE selection function and the spatially variable dust obscuration. We determine that all MAPs with enhanced are centrally concentrated and are well-described as exponentials with a scale length of over the whole radial range of the disk. We discover that the surface-density profiles of low- MAPs are complex: they do not monotonically decrease outwards, but rather display a peak radius ranging from to at low . The extensive radial coverage of the data allows us to measure radial trends in the thickness of each MAP. While high- MAPs have constant scale heights, low- MAPs flare. We confirm, now with high-precision abundances, previous results that each MAP contains only a single vertical scale height and that low- , low- and high- , high- MAPs have intermediate ( ) scale heights that smoothly bridge the traditional thin- and thick-disk divide. That the high- , thick disk components do not flare is strong evidence against their thickness being caused by radial migration. The correspondence between the radial structure and chemical-enrichment age of stellar populations is clear confirmation of the inside-out growth of galactic disks. The details of these relations will constrain the variety of physical conditions under which stars form throughout the MW disk.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. P. Hopkins
  2. Volker Springel
  3. I. Minchev
  4. L. Hernquist
  5. Hans-Walter Rix
  6. Jo Bovy
  7. D. Keres̆
  8. Simon D. M. White

In Instrumentation

  1. I. Minchev
  2. P. Hopkins
  3. L. Hernquist
  4. Volker Springel
  5. Hans-Walter Rix
  6. D. Keres̆
  7. M. Martig
  8. Jo Bovy

Citations in the corpus