Forecasting and Analysis of Marketing Data Using Neural Networks
By Jingtao Yao, N. Teng, Hean-Lee Poh, Chew Lim Tan. 1998
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Aaron Fisher
- Cynthia Rudin
- Francesca Dominici
- M. Gevrey
- Young‐Seuk Park
- R. Céréghino
- Arthur Compin
- Sovan Lek
Citations in the corpus
- All Models are Wrong, but Many are Useful: Learning a Variable’s Importance by Studying an Entire Class of Prediction Models Simultaneously (2018, methodology): “A similar “Perturb” VI measure has been used for neural networks, where noise is added to covariates (Recknagel et al., 1997; Yao et al., 1998; Scardi and Harding, 1999; Gevrey et al., 2003).”
- Review and comparison of methods to study the contribution of variables in artificial neural network models (2003, methodology): “In fact, the mean square error (MSE) of the neural network output is expected to increase as a larger amount of noise is added to the selected input variable ( Yao et al., 1998; Scardi and Harding, 1999).”
- All Models are Wrong but many are Useful: Variable Importance for Black-Box, Proprietary, or Misspecified Prediction Models, using Model Class Reliance (2018, methodology): “A similar “Perturb” VI measure has been used for neural networks, where noise is added to covariates (Recknagel et al., 1997; Yao et al., 1998; Scardi and Harding, 1999; Gevrey et al., 2003).”
- Applications of artificial neural networks for patterning and predicting aquatic insect species richness in running waters (2003, methodology): “There are many ways to perform the sensitivity analysis (Helton, 1993; Zurada et al., 1994; Hamby, 1994; Yao et al., 1998).”