COMBINATORIAL RIGIDITY IN CURVE COMPLEXES AND MAPPING CLASS GROUPS
By K. Shackleton. 2005
71 citations recorded by the source corpus.
In all possible cases, we prove that local embeddings between two curve complexes whose complexities do not increase from domain to codomain are induced by surface homeomorphism. This is our first main result. From this we can deduce our second, a strong local co-Hopfian property for mapping class groups.
Subfields: Geometry and Topology, Mathematical Physics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/666d544f5792a3403b6b6338ec17f8ac78d6fd80
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Geometry and Topology
- Jason A. Behrstock
- Dany Margalit
- John D. McCarthy
- Elmas Irmak
- Christopher J. Leininger
- Javier Aramayona
- Juan Souto
- Benson Farb
In Mathematical Physics
- Jason A. Behrstock
- Dany Margalit
- John D. McCarthy
- Elmas Irmak
- Christopher J. Leininger
- Javier Aramayona
- Juan Souto
- Benson Farb
Citations in the corpus
- Injective simplicial maps of the arc complex (2006, background): “Shackleton proved that injective simplicial maps of the curve complex are induced by homeomorphisms in [21] (he also considers maps between different surfaces), and he obtained strong local co-Hopfian results for mapping class groups.”
- Injections of mapping class groups (2008, methodology): “Automorphisms of mapping class groups ∗Partially supported by M.E.C. grant MTM2006/14688 †Partially supported by NSF grant DMS-0603881 ‡Partially supported by NSF grant DMS-0706878 and Alfred P. Sloan Foundation were classified by Ivanov [18], Korkmaz [23] and Luo [26]; and injections from finite in”
- Injections of Artin groups (2005, unknown): “G R ] 1 7”
- Curve Complexes and Finite Index Subgroups of Mapping Class Groups (2005, methodology): “He used it to show (in most cases) that any simplicial embedding of a curve complex into a curve complex of equal or lesser dimension is necessarily an automorphism [ 27 ].”