Patch Size and Connectivity Thresholds for Butterfly Habitat Restoration

By C. Schultz, Elizabeth E. Crone. 2005

91 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/664f4c8211f79a3027401b2186fab929079769d5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. A. MacDougall
2. R. Turkington
3. Y. Buckley

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. R. Turkington
2. A. MacDougall
3. Y. Buckley

In Plant Science

1. R. Turkington
2. A. MacDougall

Citations in the corpus

• Does the Type of Disturbance Matter When Restoring Disturbance‐Dependent Grasslands? (2007, background): “…2001); (2) the former disturbances cannot function as before because of habitat loss, population decline, and community change (Leach & Givnish 1996; Schultz & Crone 2005; Varner et al. 2005); and (3) there may be substantial costs and risks with implementation in settled or managed landscapes.”
• Patch and landscape factors shape community assemblage of bumble bees, Bombus spp. (Hymenoptera: Apidae), in montane meadows (2007, unknown): “Another possibility is that the quality of habitat is much more important than patch size (Fred and Brommer, 2003; Schultz and Crone, 2005).”