The trade-off between growth rate and yield in microbial communities and the consequences for under-snow soil respiration in a high elevation coniferous forest

By D. Lipson, Russell K. Monson, S. K. Schmidt, M. Weintraub. 2009

139 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Soil Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/664dfb6f0c8c7c685bb333d6b457df70fcc931eb

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. Y. Kuzyakov
2. E. Blagodatskaya
3. S. Blagodatsky
4. E. Kyker-Snowman
5. J. Curiel Yuste
6. Josep Peñuelas
7. Serita Frey
8. Jordi Sardans

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. Jordi Sardans
2. Romà Ogaya
3. M. Estiarte
4. Josep Peñuelas
5. Serita Frey
6. Y. Kuzyakov
7. Oscar Gordo
8. J. Sanz

In Soil Science

1. Y. Kuzyakov
2. E. Blagodatskaya
3. Jordi Sardans
4. Josep Peñuelas
5. S. Blagodatsky
6. M. Estiarte
7. E. Kyker-Snowman
8. M. Dorodnikov

Citations in the corpus

• Microorganisms and climate change: terrestrial feedbacks and mitigation options (2010, unknown): “There is already some evidence of microbial control of greenhouse gas flu”
• Active microorganisms in soil: Critical review of estimation criteria and approaches (2013, background): “05 h 1) (Lipson et al., 2009); by the factor of 2e4 under drying-rewetting (m ¼ 0.04e0.”
• Elevated atmospheric CO2 increases microbial growth rates in soil: results of three CO2 enrichment experiments (2010, methodology): “…rates of microorganisms responding to substrate additions can therefore serve as robust and simple method to quantitatively estimate changes in whole microbial community caused by environmental changes (Monson et al., 2006; Lipson et al., 2009) including pCO2 increase (Dorodnikov et al., 2009a).”
• The microbial aspect of climate change (2016, background): “In this regard, a few researchers have tried to incorporate microbial data (biomass, enzyme, and growth kinetics) into climate models (Lipson et al. 2009; Allison et al. 2010).”
• Microbial carbon use efficiency: accounting for population, community, and ecosystem-scale controls over the fate of metabolized organic matter (2016, background): “…and fungi have been broadly classified as r- and K-strategists, respectively, due to their anticipated average relative growth rates and CUE (Rousk and Baath 2007; Lipson et al. 2009; Keiblinger et al. 2010; Reischke et al. 2014), although efficient bacteria and inefficient fungi likely also exist.”
• Drought‐resistant fungi control soil organic matter decomposition and its response to temperature (2011, background): “Indeed, the microbial community can possess the metabolic and genetic capability of adapting to changing environmental conditions on short-time scales, e.g. seasonally (Lipson et al., 2002, 2009; Waldrop & Firestone, 2006a, b; Schmidt et al., 2007; Williams, 2007).”