Low-Calcium fly ash-based geopolymer concrete: Long-term properties

By S. Wallah, B. V. Rangan. 2006

552 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6645bf919ea25428adadedd44b213fe8a39d5568

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Ali Rafeet
2. Faiz Shaikh
3. R. Vinai
4. A. Castel
5. M. Johari
6. M. Soutsos
7. Wei Sha
8. Chakradhara Rao Meesala

Citations in the corpus

• Performance of Fly ash Based Geopolymer Mortars in Sulphate Solution (2010, background): “S. E. Wallah and B. V. Rangan, Low calcium fly ash based geopolymer concrete: Long term properties, Research report GC2, Curtin University of Technology, Australia (2006).”
• Engineering properties and carbon footprint of ground granulated blast-furnace slag-palm oil fuel ash-based structural geopolymer concrete (2015, methodology): “The solution of 12 molarity (M) NaOH prepared with 99% purity, such that 361 g of pellets were dissolved in 1 kg of solution [25].”
• Durability of mortar and concrete containing alkali-activated binder with pozzolans: A review (2015, background): “Few researchers [12,79–81] reported a lower drying shrinkage of AA FA binders in comparison with OPC binders while others reported a higher drying shrinkage of AAS binder than OPC binder [82–85].”
• Geopolymer Concrete with Fly Ash (2010, methodology): “Heat-cured low-calcium fly ash-based geopolymer concrete also shows excellent resistance to sulfate attack, good acid resistance, undergoes low creep, and suffers very little drying shrinkage [Wallah and Rangan, 2006].”
• Effect of curing condition on the mechanical properties of fly ash-based geopolymer concrete (2019, background): “The previous studies on the GPC reported that the use of F class of FA on the production of GPC has comparable or superior mechanical properties to the OPC concretes [21, 22].”
• Effect of process parameters on the performance of fly ash/GGBS blended geopolymer composites (2018, background): “Although the workability of geopolymer mortar is different than its OPC counterpart, previous studies have proven its adequacy for geopolymer mixtures [31,32].”
• Creep and drying shrinkage of a blended slag and low calcium fly ash geopolymer Concrete (2016, background): “The strain due to drying shrinkage of ambient-cured specimens was in the order of 250 micro-strains after three months, which is higher than the ones obtained by Wallah and Rangan [18].”