A quenched study of m_b in HQET beyond the leading order
By M. Morte, N. Garron, R. Sommer, M. Papinutto. 2005
382 citations recorded by the source corpus.
A non perturbative method to compute the mass of the b quark including the 1/m term in HQET has been presented in a companion talk. Following this strategy, we find in the MS bar scheme m_b^{stat}(m_b) = 4.350(64) GeV for the leading term, and m_b^{(1)}(m_b) = -0.049(29) GeV for the next to leading order correction. This method involves several steps, including the simulation of the relativistic theory in a small volume, and of the effective theory in a big volume. Here we present some numerical details of our calculations.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/663bd8cde8e6aec2aee5c04a439f904ef922aaa7
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Eric Laloy
- Jasper A. Vrugt
- Diederik Jacques
- Sergey Bravyi
- B. Rogiers
- Tiangang Cui
- Dan E. Browne
- Dirk Mallants
Citations in the corpus
- Scale Setting in Lattice QCD (2014, background): “nge mass than other common choices. 1For the definition of variance and autocorrelation times for derived observables (such as masses extracted from a correlation function, the primary observable) see [5]. 2Note that the arguments of [7, 8] refer to the square root of the variance of the correlation ”
- Simulation of quantum circuits by low-rank stabilizer decompositions (2018, methodology): “Error bars represent the statistical error estimated using the MATLAB code due to Wolff [33].”
- Bayesian calibration of a large‐scale geothermal reservoir model by a new adaptive delayed acceptance Metropolis Hastings algorithm (2011, background): “The 14 of 26 estimated IACT is given by the vertical axis of Figure 6(d), which is 2.80 at the optimal window size, while the statistical errors [see Wolff, 2004] of these estimates are summarized by vertical error bars.”
- High-precision scale setting in lattice QCD (2012, methodology): “Thus, we compute the integrated autocorrelation time of the flow as a function of t, using the standard methodology described in [35].”
- Trapped Antihydrogen in Its Ground State (2012, unknown): “The ALPHA collaboration was similarly concerned about mirror-trapped p corrupting their trapped H experiments [180, 181].”
- Efficient posterior exploration of a high‐dimensional groundwater model from two‐stage Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation and polynomial chaos expansion (2013, methodology): “The variables and can be estimated for some statistics of interest of the Markov chain using, e.g., the inverse of the relative numerical efficiency of Geweke [1992], or the integrated autocorrelation time [IACT; Wolff, 2004].”