AI Superpowers: China, Silicon Valley, and the New World Order

By Kai-Fu Lee. 2018

421 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6636b677dfac868e9455e7a85fdac5cb58a9026b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

The Chinese approach to artificial intelligence: an analysis of policy, ethics, and regulation (2020, background): “Two government insiders described this match as a ‘Sputnik moment’ for the development of AI within China (Lee 2018, p. 3).”
Regulatory Markets for AI Safety (2019, background): “China is characterized by some observers as pursuing this approach to regulation: develop first, learn about the effects, then develop regulation (Lee, 2018).”
The rise of artificial intelligence in healthcare applications (2020, background): “A perfect combination of increased computer processing speed, larger data collection data libraries, and a large AI talent pool has enabled rapid development of AI tools and technology, also within healthcare [5].”
Toward Fair, Accountable, and Transparent Algorithms: Case Studies on Algorithm Initiatives in Korea and China (2019, background): “The Chinese Council ’ s AI predicts AI will play a key role in preserving social stability, an aim re ﬂ ected in local integrations of AI across a far-reaching range of public services (Lee 2019).”
Item Response Theory—A Statistical Framework for Educational and Psychological Measurement (2021, unknown): “Thanks to the development of technology and data science, a personalization revolution is ongoing in all areas of our life, including mental health, education, social networking, among others (Lee, 2018).”
Decolonial AI: Decolonial Theory as Sociotechnical Foresight in Artificial Intelligence (2020, background): “In some views, this is a manifestation of a new type of geopolitics amongst ‘AI superpowers’ (Lee, 2018), and a rise of ‘AI nationalism’, where nations wrangle to spread a preferred view of policy, applied approaches and technical services (Hogarth, 2018; Edgerton, 2007b).”