Institutions and the Environmental Kuznets Curve for Deforestation: A Crosscountry Analysis for Latin America, Africa and Asia
By M. Bhattarai, M. Hammig. 2001
577 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/662f5c398ed1804adf39907db3a2d47b93b7680c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Muhammad Shahbaz
- Avik Sinha
- R. Culas
- Ilhan Ozturk
- Robert M. Ewers
- Syed Jawad Hussain Shahzad
- Muhammad Azam
- Daniel Balsalobre
In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
- R. Culas
- Muhammad Shahbaz
- Robert M. Ewers
- Soumyananda Dinda
- Avik Sinha
- Meilanie Buitenzorgy
- Arthur P. J. Mol
- P. C. Motel
Citations in the corpus
- Interaction effects between economic development and forest cover determine deforestation rates (2006, background): “Moreover, human population pressure (Cropper and Griffiths, 1994; Pfaff, 1999; Geist and Lambin, 2001), governmental and financial institutions (Bhattarai and Hammig, 2001, Klooster, 2003; Meyer et al., 2003), economic freedom and stability (Barbier, 2001; Meyer et al., 2003), the spatial…”
- Economic growth and CO2 emissions in Malaysia: A cointegration analysis of the Environmental Kuznets Curve (2012, background): “…Robers and Grimes, 1997), sulfur dioxide (Grossman and Krueger, 1991; Selden and Song, 1994; De Bruyn, 1997; Stern et al., 1996; Kaufmann et al., 1998) and municipal waste (Shafik and Bandyopadhyay, 1992; Shafik, 1994; Vincent, 1997; Rothman, 1998; Koop and Tole, 1999; Bhattarai and Hammig, 2001).”
- Governance, economic policy, and the environmental Kuznets curve for natural tropical forests (2004, methodology): “Past studies of the economics of deforestation have used FAO statistics on forest and woodlands to derive the deforestation rate (Cropper and Griffiths, 1994; Koop and Tole, 1999; Bhattarai and Hammig, 2001).”
- Democracy and Environmental Quality (2006, background): “For example, in their study of the causes of deforestation in Latin America, Africa, and Asia, Bhattarai and Hammig (2001) use a measurement of institutional quality, measured by an index of political rights and civil liberties, to account for the role of different policy regimes.”
- A methodology to estimate impacts of domestic policies on deforestation: Compensated Successful Efforts for “avoided deforestation” (REDD) (2009, background): “…variables, because these are among the most obvious tools available to public authorities: “strengthening of sociopolitical institutions would help to flatten the EKC for deforestation and reduce the present level of tropical deforestation worldwide” (Bhattarai and Hammig, 2001, p. 1006).”
- Policy instruments to enhance multi-functional forest management (2007, unknown): “The turning point, where deforestation rates start to fall, appears to vary across countries and to depend on other conditions, such as the distribution of wealth and political freedoms (Bhattarai and Hammig, 2001).”
- Impact of institutional quality on environment and energy consumption: evidence from developing world (2020, background): “The literature mentions the role of institutional quality to conserve forest area (Bhattarai and Hammig 2001; Arvin and Lew 2011; Culas 2007; Ehrhardt-Martinez et al.”