Wing geometry in Triatoma infestans (Klug) and T. melanosoma Martinez, Olmedo & Carcavallo (Hemiptera: Reduviidae)

By M. Gumiel, S. Catalá, F. Noireau, A. R. Arias, A. García, J. Dujardin. 2003

96 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Discrimination of Eubazus (Hymenoptera, Braconidae) sibling species using geometric morphometrics analysis of wing venation (2007, methodology): “Although this technique is sufficiently powerful to solve complex, species-level taxonomic problems (Matias et al., 2001; Gumiel et al., 2003; Shipunov & Bateman, 2005), examples of geometric morphometrics as a taxonomic discrimination tool for Hymenoptera are few.”
Subjective visual evaluation vs. traditional and geometric morphometrics in species delimitation: a comparison of moth genitalia (2007, unknown): “…and systematic studies (e.g. Rohlf & Archie, 1984; Rohlf et al., 1996; Fulford & Rutherford, 2000; Drotz et al., 2001; Monti et al., 2001; Pretorius & Scholtz, 2001; Querino et al., 2002; Baylac et al., 2003; Gumiel et al., 2003; Becerra & Valdecasas, 2004; Mutanen, 2005; Pretorius, 2005).”
Landmark based geometric morphometric analysis of wing shape in Sibiricobombus Vogt (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Bombus Latreille) (2007, background): “At the present time, geometric morphometric studies have gained signifi cant support especially among anatomists (Lockwood et al. 2002) and taxonomists (Rohlf 1993; Alibert et al. 2001; Gumiel et al. 2003) by the use of various morphological characters.”