Do eye movements measured across high and low fascination photographs differ? Addressing Kaplan's fascination hypothesis

By R. Berto, S. Massaccesi, Margherita Pasini. 2008

211 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Sensory Systems

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6620f4249cb005e0498c16422df1603727bc41a0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis

In Sensory Systems

Citations in the corpus

The Role of Nature in Coping with Psycho-Physiological Stress: A Literature Review on Restorativeness (2014, background): “Nature is especially conducive to our involuntary attention engagement; on the contrary built content captures attention dramatically, requiring attention to be overcome [6,8,24].”
Destination Fascination and Destination Loyalty: Subjective Well-Being and Destination Attachment as Mediators (2020, background): “Additionally, fascinating environments are more appealing and attract more attention (Berto, Massaccesi, and Pasini 2008).”
Tracking Restorative Components: Patterns in Eye Movements as a Consequence of a Restorative Rating Task (2013, methodology): “Berto et al. (2008) hypothesised that restorative and nonrestorative scenes would thus generate different eye movements.”
An Eye-Tracking Study of Tourism Photo Stimuli (2016, background): “Providing opportunity to reflect, viewing natural scenes allows the attention system to rest and recover more than exposure to built environments (Berto et al. 2008; Kaplan 1995; Lidwell et al. 2010; Ulrich et al. 1991).”
Restorative Effects of Virtual Nature Settings (2010, unknown): “5 Recent research by Berto et al. 8 examining eye movements when looking at images of urban and nature settings demonstrated fewer ﬁxations in high-fascination (nature) scenes, suggesting that they were viewed with less effort and providing support for the notion that nature modestly promotes involu”
Cognitive and affective responses to natural scenes: Effects of low level visual properties on preference, cognitive load and eye-movements (2015, background): “The current study successfully replicated some of the findings by Berto et al. (2008), supporting Attention Restoration Theory.”