REGN-COV2, a Neutralizing Antibody Cocktail, in Outpatients with Covid-19
By D. Weinreich, S. Sivapalasingam, Thomas D. Norton, Shazia Ali, Haitao Gao, R. Bhore, B. Musser, Y. Soo, D. Rofail, Joseph Im and 23 more. New England Journal of Medicine, 2020
1,474 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Abstract Background Recent data suggest that complications and death from coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) may be related to high viral loads. Methods In this ongoing, double-blind, phase 1–3 trial involving nonhospitalized patients with Covid-19, we investigated two fully human, neutralizing monoclonal antibodies against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) spike protein, used in a combined cocktail (REGN-COV2) to reduce the risk of the emergence of treatment-resistant mutant virus. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive placebo, 2.4 g of REGN-COV2, or 8.0 g of REGN-COV2 and were prospectively characterized at baseline for endogenous immune response against SARS-CoV-2 (serum antibody–positive or serum antibody–negative). Key end points included the time-weighted average change in viral load from baseline (day 1) through day 7 and the percentage of patients with at least one Covid-19–related medically attended visit through day 29. Safety was assessed in all patients. Results Data from 275 patients are reported. The least-squares mean difference (combined REGN-COV2 dose groups vs. placebo group) in the time-weighted average change in viral load from day 1 through day 7 was −0.56 log10 copies per milliliter (95% confidence interval [CI], −1.02 to −0.11) among patients who were serum antibody–negative at baseline and −0.41 log10 copies per milliliter (95% CI, −0.71 to −0.10) in the overall trial population. In the overall trial population, 6% of the patients in the placebo group and 3% of the patients in the combined REGN-COV2 dose groups reported at least one medically attended visit; among patients who were serum antibody–negative at baseline, the corresponding percentages were 15% and 6% (difference, −9 percentage points; 95% CI, −29 to 11). The percentages of patients with hypersensitivity reactions, infusion-related reactions, and other adverse events were similar in the combined REGN-COV2 dose groups and the placebo group. Conclusions In this interim analysis, the REGN-COV2 antibody cocktail reduced viral load, with a greater effect in patients whose immune response had not yet been initiated or who had a high viral load at baseline. Safety outcomes were similar in the combined REGN-COV2 dose groups and the placebo group. (Funded by Regeneron Pharmaceuticals and the Biomedical and Advanced Research and Development Authority of the Department of Health and Human Services; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04425629.)
Subfields: Dermatology, Infectious Diseases
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/660fa9d9e39023ffaa745076c40d7e5b6aee7d24
Citations in the corpus
- SARS-CoV-2 Omicron-B.1.1.529 leads to widespread escape from neutralizing antibody responses (2022, neutral): “Specifically, they are as follows: Regeneron 10933 and 10987: Regeneron 10933 (Weinreich et al., 2021) binds to the back of the left shoulder and 10987 to the right shoulder ( Figures 5G and S5); activity of both is knocked out on Omicron (Figure 4C).”
- Antibody escape of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.4 and BA.5 from vaccine and BA.1 serum (2022, neutral): “REAGENT or RESOURCE SOURCE IDENTIFIER Antibodies Nanobody C1 Huo et al., 2020a N/A Fab Dejnirattisai et al., 2021a N/A IgG Dejnirattisai et al., 2021a; Liu et al., 2021b N/A EY6A mAb Zhou et al., 2020 N/A Regeneron mAbs AstraZeneca Cat#REGN10933, and REGN10987 AstraZeneca mAbs AstraZeneca Cat#AZD106”