Signal crosstalk and induced resistance: straddling the line between cost and benefit.

By R. Bostock. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 2005

633 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Insect Science, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6606ae277bada630f14857392dbb2ec6be12dee6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Insect Science

In Plant Science

Citations in the corpus

Unraveling mycorrhiza-induced resistance. (2007, background): “Intensive efforts have been devoted over the past years to determine interactions within the defense regulation network, and trade-offs between SA and JA signaling pathways are well documented [36,37].”
Priming Plant Defence Against Pathogens by Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi (2009, background): “between SA and JA pathways are well documented (Bostock 2005 ; Beckers and Spoel 2006 ; Koornneef and Pieterse 2008) .”
The Role of WRKY Transcription Factors in Plant Immunity[W] (2009, background): “PTI and ETI activate local as well as systemic defense responses (called systemic acquired resistance [SAR]), which are modulated by phytohormones, especially jasmonic acid (JA) and SA (Durrant and Dong, 2004; Bostock, 2005).”
Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria mediate induced systemic resistance in rice against bacterial leaf blight caused by Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae (2011, background): “This phenomenon is known as induced systemic resistance and can be triggered by a variety of biotic and abiotic stimuli (Bostock, 2005).”
Networks of WRKY transcription factors in defense signaling. (2007, background): “In Arabidopsis thaliana (Arabidopsis) and other higher plants, local and systemic defense responses are controlled by the balanced action of distinct, but partially interconnected pathways involving the hormones salicylic acid (SA) and jasmonic acid (JA) [9].”
Hormonal modulation of plant immunity. (2012, background): “Indeed, trade-offs between SA-dependent resistance to biotrophs and JA-dependent defense against insect herbivores or necrotrophs have been reported repeatedly (Bostock 2005, Kunkel & Brooks 2002, Verhage et al. 2010).”
Costs and benefits of induced resistance to herbivores and pathogens in plants (2010, background): “biotroph versus necrotroph) [30], and can even vary with the time of day [31].”
Salicylic Acid, a multifaceted hormone to combat disease. (2009, background): “Because one pathway represses the other, plants appear to trade off the costs and benefits of different defense responses (12).”
Deciphering Chemical Language of Plant Communication (2016, background): “In particular, evidence suggests that JA and SA signalling can interact negatively, so induction of one pathway generally downregulates gene expression induced by the other (Bostock 2005; Mittler 2006; Koornneef and Pieterse 2008; Thaler et al. 2012).”