Comparing and combining process-based crop models and statistical models with some implications for climate change

By Michael J. Roberts, Noah Braun, Thomas R. Sinclair, David B. Lobell, W. Schlenker. 2017

167 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We compare predictions of a simple process-based crop model (Soltani and Sinclair ), a simple statistical model (Schlenker and Roberts ), and a combination of both models to actual maize yields on a large, representative sample of farmer-managed fields in the Corn Belt region of the United States. After statistical post-model calibration, the process model (Simple Simulation Model, or SSM) predicts actual outcomes slightly better than the statistical model, but the combined model performs significantly better than either model. The SSM, statistical model and combined model all show similar relationships with precipitation, while the SSM better accounts for temporal patterns of precipitation, vapor pressure deficit and solar radiation. The statistical and combined models show a more negative impact associated with extreme heat for which the process model does not account. Due to the extreme heat effect, predicted impacts under uniform climate change scenarios are considerably more severe for the statistical and combined models than for the process-based model.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Plant Science, Soil Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/65fba333ca07069b57a3cd07454446c239333581

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

  1. Andrew Crane-Droesch

In Plant Science

  1. Andrew Crane-Droesch
  2. Arpit Jain
  3. Abhinav Sharma
  4. Prateek Gupta
  5. V. Chowdary

In Soil Science

  1. Andrew Crane-Droesch

Citations in the corpus