Short-Run Pain, Long-Run Gain: The Effects of Financial Liberalization (Abstract )

By Graciela L. Kaminsky, S. Schmukler. 2002

164 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/65ed910e39f11274432ca67e0ddbcc933ced7ea2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Investor Protection, Optimal Incentives, and Economic Growth (2004, methodology): “1 Introduction Recent work beginning with La Porta et al. (1998) has documented considerable cross-country differences in many indicators of investor protection.”
Predicting Global Stock Returns (2008, unknown): “As seen in the international finance literature (e.g., Kaminsky and Schmukler (2002)), however, it is often difficult to determine the exact date of deregulation.”
Trade, Finance, Specialization, and Synchronization (2003, unknown): “For instance, the data sets of Kaminsky and Schmukler (2002) and of Edison and Warnock (2001) cover almost exclusively developing economies.”
Stock market liberalization and the information environment (2006, background): “More generally, the evidence in Kaminsky and Schmukler (2002) suggests that liberalization tends to spur the process of institutional reform, not the other way around.”
Financial Globalization: Gain and Pain for Developing Countries (2003, unknown): “Even though the domestic financial sector and the capital account were heavily regulated for a long time, Kaminsky and Schmukler (2002) show how the restrictions have been lifted over time.”
The Positive Link between Financial Liberalization, Growth and Crises (2004, unknown): “The sample does not cover the period before 1993; the financial liberalization date is therefore set to 1989, which fits the dates of Kaminsky and Schmukler (2002) and Bekaert, Harvey, and Lundblad (2001).”