SYSTEMATICS OF DYNAMICAL MASS EJECTION, NUCLEOSYNTHESIS, AND RADIOACTIVELY POWERED ELECTROMAGNETIC SIGNALS FROM NEUTRON-STAR MERGERS

By A. Bauswein, S. Goriely, H. J. M. Astrophysics, Garching, Universit́e Libre de Bruxelles. 2013

360 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We investigate systematically the dynamical mass ejection, r-process nucleosynthesis, and properties of electromagnetic counterparts of neutron-star (NS) mergers in dependence on the uncertain properties of the nuclear equation of state (EOS) by employing 40 representative, microphysical high-density EOSs in relativistic, hydrodynamical simulations. The crucial parameter determining the ejecta mass is the radius R1.35 of a 1.35 M☉ NS. NSs with smaller R1.35 (“soft” EOS) eject systematically higher masses. These range from ∼10−3 M☉ to ∼10−2 M☉ for 1.35–1.35 M☉ binaries and from ∼5 × 10−3 M☉ to ∼2 × 10−2 M☉ for 1.2–1.5 M☉ systems (with kinetic energies between ∼5 × 1049 erg and 1051 erg). Correspondingly, the bolometric peak luminosities of the optical transients of symmetric (asymmetric) mergers vary between 3 × 1041 erg s−1 and 14 × 1041 erg s−1 (9 × 1041 erg s−1 and 14.5 × 1041 erg s−1) on timescales between ∼2 hr and ∼12 hr. If these signals with absolute bolometric magnitudes from −15.0 to −16.7 are measured, the tight correlation of their properties with those of the merging NSs might provide valuable constraints on the high-density EOS. The r-process nucleosynthesis exhibits a remarkable robustness independent of the EOS, producing a nearly solar abundance pattern above mass number 130. By the r-process content of the Galaxy and the average production per event the Galactic merger rate is limited to 4 × 10−5 yr−1 (4 × 10−4 yr−1) for a soft (stiff) NS EOS, if NS mergers are the main source of heavy r-nuclei. The production ratio of radioactive 232Th to 238U attains a stable value of 1.64–1.67, which does not exclude NS mergers as potential sources of heavy r-material in the most metal-poor stars.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/65ce23760a51c14b654937ae540a5e6ffc966e1c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. B. Metzger
  2. E. Quataert
  3. D. Kasen
  4. E. Berger
  5. David Radice
  6. R. Fern'andez
  7. Albino Perego
  8. Luke F. Roberts

In Instrumentation

  1. P. Hopkins
  2. L. Hernquist
  3. Volker Springel
  4. B. Metzger
  5. Simon D. M. White
  6. E. Quataert
  7. Andrey V. Kravtsov
  8. Risa Wechsler

Citations in the corpus