Noise, predation risk compensation and vigilance in the chaffinch Fringilla coelebs
By J. Quinn, Mark J. Whittingham, S. Butler, W. Cresswell. 2006
235 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Developmental Biology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Small Animals
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/65c9effae84c374411c332519841334f680919d5
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Developmental Biology
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
In Small Animals
Citations in the corpus
- Habitat urbanization and its effects on birds (2015, background): “For example, in elevated background noise Chaffinches Fringilla coelebs increase their vigilance and reduce their pecking rate during foraging (Quinn et al. 2006), and in Tree Swallows Tachycineta bicolor the experimentally elevated static noise reduced nestlings’ ability to respond parental alarm…”
- A synthesis of two decades of research documenting the effects of noise on wildlife (2016, background): “For example, animals that remain in a ‘noisy’ habitat because it provides a shelter from predators will likely have to contend with sensory degradation, either through changes in vocalisations (Mockford & Marshall, 2009; Mockford, Marshall & Dabelsteen, 2011) or vigilance patterns (Quinn et al., 200”
- Context-dependent impacts of anthropogenic noise on individual and social behaviour in a cooperatively breeding fish (2013, background): “…al. 2006), damage hearing (Clark 1991; Smith et al. 2004), increase metabolic rate (Wale et al. 2013), mask/alter communication (Slabbekoorn & Peet 2003; Vasconcelos et al. 2007), cause avoidance (Engas et al. 1996; Schaub et al. 2008) and impair foraging (Quinn et al. 2006; Purser & Radford 2011).”
- Negative impact of traffic noise on avian reproductive success (2011, background): “opportunities, because prey are less easy to detect (Schaub, Ostwald& Siemers 2008), or becausemore time has to be spent scanning for predators (Quinn et al. 2006).”
- Road traffic noise modifies behaviour of a keystone species (2014, background): “…associatedwith exposure to traffic noise in natural environments and are consistent with laboratory-based playback studies that have explored the effects of anthropogenic noise on other taxa in captive conditions (Quinn et al., 2006; Schaub et al., 2008; Siemers & Schaub 2011; Wale et al., 2013b).”
- A Framework for Understanding Noise Impacts on Wildlife: An Urgent Conservation Priority (2013, background): “Both distraction and elevated vigilance could also cause a decrease in foraging rates and success (ie a trade-off; Figure 3o; Gavin and Komers 2006; Quinn et al. 2006).”
- Reproductive failure of a human-tolerant species, the American kestrel, is associated with stress and human disturbance (2013, background): “noise) may elicit behavioural or physiological responses because organisms perceive humans as potential predators (Beale & Monaghan 2004) or, more broadly, they may perceive human-dominated landscapes as having a higher predation risk (Frid & Dill 2002; Quinn et al. 2006).”
- Noise pollution changes avian communities and species interactions. (2009, background): “Further research is needed to identify mechanisms responsible for settlement in noise areas and the potential tradeoffs associated with living in noisy conditions, such as declines in feeding rates [24, 25].”
- Animal Communication and Noise (2013, background): “Although hindrance of predator detection by noise is often mentioned in the literature (Quinn et al. 2006; Barber et al. 2009; Brumm 2010), studies are lacking that actually quantify the increase of bird predation rates due to noise-induced missed alarm call detection.”