EU compliance: Still a ‘black hole’?

By Ellen Mastenbroek. 2005

262 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Finance, Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/65c30f4e51fbdb05f9616a03ddc909b42ae45629

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Finance

1. Torben Heinze
2. Ulrich Sedelmeier
3. Christoph Knill

In Political Science and International Relations

1. Torben Heinze
2. Ulrich Sedelmeier
3. Christoph Knill
4. Frank Schimmelfennig
5. Daniel W. Drezner
6. Peter H. Starke

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Torben Heinze
2. Ulrich Sedelmeier
3. Christoph Knill

Citations in the corpus

• After conditionality: post-accession compliance with EU law in East Central Europe (2008, background): “Research into member states’ compliance with EU law has become a large and thriving subfield in EU studies, but it still remains somewhat inconclusive with regard to the factors that account for (non-)compliance (for recent overviews, see, e.g., Mastenbroek 2005; Treib 2006).”
• Analysing the differential impact of the Bologna Process: Theoretical considerations on national conditions for international policy convergence (2008, background): “The significance of agency-related factors like domestic preferences and beliefs, especially of national governments, for explaining crossnational policy convergence has been highlighted in convergence studies as well as in research on Europeanization (see Holzinger and Knill 2007; Mastenbroek 2005)”