4 – Metapopulation Dynamics in Highly Fragmented Landscapes

By Otso Ovaskainen, Ilkka Hanski. 2004

103 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/65c01ad978171eb3036e4119d8b6f9fdc9f5415b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

Human influence lowers plant genetic diversity in communities with extinction debt (2009, background): “…in a local community are doomed to extinction due to altered environmental conditions (e.g. loss of habitat area, increasing isolation, decrease of habitat quality), but the actual extinction event has not yet occurred due to the slow intrinsic dynamics of populations (Ovaskainen & Hanski 2004).”
A brief guide to Landscape Genetics (2006, background): “Spatially realistic metapopulation models typically consider the geographic distance between patches (Ovaskainen and Hanski 2004), but do not include matrix quality.”
Predicting extinction risk of butterflies and moths (Macrolepidoptera) from distribution patterns and species characteristics (2007, background): “Further the Kullaberg area is situated relatively isolated, and probably the area of suitable habitats has become to scanty to maintain the high species richness that once occupied the area, and the habitat left is not enough (Ovaskainen and Hanski 2003, 2004).”
Integrating species distribution models and interacting particle systems to predict the spread of an invasive alien plant (2010, methodology): “In particular, making colonization (and extinction) probabilities in stochastic patch occupancy models (Ovaskainen & Hanski, 2004) dependent on SDM predictions would be conceptually similar to the Combined model presented here.”
Extinction threshold in metapopulation models (2003, methodology): “As an attempt to overcome this limitation of the original model, we (Hanski & Ovaskainen 2000, Ovaskainen 2002a, 2002b, 2003, Ovaskainen & Hanski 2001, 2002, 2004, Ovaskainen et al. 2002) have extended the Levins model to a model termed the spatially realistic Levins model (SRLM), which does not…”
Dispersal and the metapopulation paradigm in amphibian ecology and conservation : are all amphibian populations metapopulations? (2005, background): “…to these simple conditions for the single reason that simple, stochastic metapopulations are likely good models for real populations living in highly fragmented landscapes (Ovaskainen and Hanski 2004) / a situation which includes many temperate, pond-breeding amphibians (Marsh and Trenham 2001).”
Confounding factors in the detection of species responses to habitat fragmentation (2005, background): “One of the key conclusions from metapopulation modelling is that the probability of population extinction depends not only on habitat area, or quality, but on spatial location within the metapopulation network (Ovaskainen & Hanski, 2004).”
An empirical evaluation of the area and isolation paradigm of metapopulation dynamics (2007, background): “…populations in a metapopulation, and the persistence of the metapopulation as a whole, is best modeled by the area of habitat patches and the isolation of patches (Hanski, 1994, 1998, 1999; Moilanen, 1999; Hanski and Ovaskainen, 2000; Hanski and Gaggiotti, 2004; Ovaskainen and Hanski, 2004).”