Equilibrium optimizer: A novel optimization algorithm

By Afshin Faramarzi, Mohammad Heidarinejad, Brent E. Stephens, Seyed Mohammad Mirjalili. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2020

1,916 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Abstract This paper presents a novel, optimization algorithm called Equilibrium Optimizer (EO), inspired by control volume mass balance models used to estimate both dynamic and equilibrium states. In EO, each particle (solution) with its concentration (position) acts as a search agent. The search agents randomly update their concentration with respect to best-so-far solutions, namely equilibrium candidates, to finally reach to the equilibrium state (optimal result). A well-defined “generation rate” term is proved to invigorate EO’s ability in exploration, exploitation, and local minima avoidance. The proposed algorithm is benchmarked with 58 unimodal, multimodal, and composition functions and three engineering application problems. Results of EO are compared to three categories of existing optimization methods, including: (i) the most well-known meta-heuristics, including Genetic Algorithm (GA), Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO); (ii) recently developed algorithms, including Grey Wolf Optimizer (GWO), Gravitational Search Algorithm (GSA), and Salp Swarm Algorithm (SSA); and (iii) high performance optimizers, including CMA-ES, SHADE, and LSHADE-SPACMA. Using average rank of Friedman test, for all 58 mathematical functions EO is able to outperform PSO, GWO, GA, GSA, SSA, and CMA-ES by 60%, 69%, 94%, 96%, 77%, and 64%, respectively, while it is outperformed by SHADE and LSHADE-SPACMA by 24% and 27%, respectively. The Bonferroni–Dunnand Holm’s tests for all functions showed that EO is significantly a better algorithm than PSO, GWO, GA, GSA, SSA and CMA-ES while its performance is statistically similar to SHADE and LSHADE-SPACMA. The source code of EO is publicly availabe at https://github.com/afshinfaramarzi/Equilibrium-Optimizer , http://built-envi.com/portfolio/equilibrium-optimizer/ and http://www.alimirjalili.com/SourceCodes/EOcode.zip .

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Computational Theory and Mathematics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/65b178fcf2fa537755a40db47bb2a5652b4d1e2f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Pavel Trojovský
  2. Mohammad Dehghani
  3. Essam H. Houssein
  4. Fatma A. Hashim
  5. Mai S. Mabrouk
  6. Walid Al-Atabany
  7. Kashif Hussain
  8. Š. Hubálovský

In Computational Theory and Mathematics

  1. Pavel Trojovský
  2. Mohammad Dehghani
  3. Essam H. Houssein
  4. Kashif Hussain
  5. Fatma A. Hashim
  6. Mai S. Mabrouk
  7. Walid Al-Atabany
  8. Š. Hubálovský

Citations in the corpus