Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe.

By Seán Hanley. 2008

2,342 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Political Science and International Relations

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/657e14ee3b7be6257e856de0b2cb64bef184154c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Political Science and International Relations

Citations in the corpus

Measuring Populism: Comparing Two Methods of Content Analysis (2011, background): “1992 1994 2001 2002 2005 2006 2008 Mainstream Parties CDA (NL) X X X PvdA (NL) X X X VVD (NL) X X D66 (NL) X X X Conservatives (UK) X X X Labour (UK) X X X Liberal Democrats (UK) X X CDU/CSU (GE) X X SPD (GE) X X FDP (GE) X X DS (IT) X X Ulivo (IT) X PD (IT) X (continued ) APPENDIX A (Continued ) 19”
The rise of the German Eurosceptic party Alternative für Deutschland, between ordoliberal critique and popular anxiety (2015, background): “Mudde (2007, 2013) defines PRRPs as sharing a core ideology that includes the combination of nativism, affinity to authoritarianism and populism.”
The rise of the populist radical right in Western Europe (2015, background): “Another reason for PRR parties’ success is that they have created a ‘detoxified’, more modern image (Mudde 2007), and thereby have differentiated themselves from fascists and (neo-)Nazis (Rydgren 2005).”
Euroscepticism as a Persistent Phenomenon (2012, neutral): “…more measured approach -but there is no doubt that opposing Europe has become an increasingly embedded part of RRPs and their overall policy packages (see Mudde, 2007, Hainsworth, 2008 where opposition to the EU and the Eurozone is closely linked to the issues of immigration and globalisation.”
Demand and Supply of Populism (2017, result): “They are instead consistent with the idea that a deterioration in individual economic security causes a loss in confidence in political parties as well as a change in attitudes towards immigrants, lending support to Hypothesis 2.(28)”
The Brexit vote: a divided nation, a divided continent (2016, background): “Indeed, the Leave campaign sought to frame the referendum as a battle between ordinary people and the political establishment, in line with the populist idea of a fundamental division between the ‘the pure people’ and the ‘corrupt elite’ (Mudde 2007).”
Populist Leaders and the Economy (2020, background): “Moreover, right-wing pop-ulists often (but not always, speciﬁcally regarding some aspects of globalization and/or ﬁnance) promote liberal economic policies, advocating business-friendly regulation, low taxes, and a limited welfare state (Betz, 1994; Mudde, 2007).”
Collective Narcissism: Political Consequences of Investing Self‐Worth in the Ingroup’s Image (2019, background): “Importantly, the populist rhetoric emphasizes the division between the “chosen” or “true” members of the ingroup and their internal opposition and outgroups seen as threatening to the plan of the ingroup’s rebirth (Mudde, 2007; Muller, 2016; Sanders, Hurtado, & Zoragastua, 2017).”
Reactionary Politics: Explaining the Psychological Roots of Anti Preferences in European Integration and Immigration Debates (2018, background): “The bundling of anti-immigration and anti-EU preferences is frequent in political rhetoric aimed at strengthening a sense of national sovereignty (Mudde, 2007).”
The Political Legacy of Entertainment TV (2019, methodology): “(9)The version used in this paper is described in Hufford (2002), and it has been previously used by Olken (2009), Enikolopov et al.”
Comparing Radical Right Parties in Government: Immigration and Integration Policies in Nine Countries (1996–2010) (2012, background): “Radical right parties are antiimmigrant because they regard newcomers as a threat to a homogenous national culture (Betz 2003; Mudde 2007: 18–20).”
Down the (White) Rabbit Hole: The Extreme Right and Online Recommender Systems (2015, background): “Channels affiliated with political parties can be observed, including the Eurosceptic United Kingdom Independence Party or the British National Party, where the latter is also considered as White Nationalist (Bartlett, Birdwell, & Littler, 2011; Mudde, 2007).”
The Populist Radical Right: A Pathological Normalcy (2010, neutral): “[4] Both extremism and radicalism challenge the fundamental values of contemporary western societies.”