The correspondence problem
By Chrystopher L. Nehaniv, Kerstin Dautenhahn. 2002
300 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Language and Linguistics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/656a16142be290c52c14100b8ab673e4060f487e
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Sergey Levine
- Pieter Abbeel
- Chelsea Finn
- Jan Peters
- Gerhard Neumann
- Tianhe Yu
- Trevor Darrell
- Abhishek Gupta
In Language and Linguistics
- Sonia Chernova
- Pieter Abbeel
- Sergey Levine
- Marco Iacoboni
- Aude Gemma Billard
- Jangwon Lee
- Harish Chaandar Ravichandar
- Alex Mesoudi
Citations in the corpus
- AVID: Learning Multi-Stage Tasks via Pixel-Level Translation of Human Videos (2019, methodology): “using explicit pose and object detection [36]–[40], essentially resolving the correspondence problem [41] by instrumenting paired data collection or manually matching hand-specified key points.”
- Movement reproduction and obstacle avoidance with dynamic movement primitives and potential fields (2008, background): “The correspondence problem refers to the possible mismatch of link lengths and joints between robot and demonstrator [7].”
- A survey of robot learning from demonstration (2009, unknown): “The challenges which arise from these differences are referred to broadly as Correspondence Issues [5].”
- Probabilistic model-based imitation learning (2013, background): “One key challenge in imitation learning is the correspondence problem [25]: If the body of the teacher and the robot differ, finding an adequate mapping from the teacher’s demonstrations to the robot is non-trivial.”
- Towards a unified science of cultural evolution. (2006, background): “…models appeal to a foundation of mirror-neuron function, leading Whiten (2005a) to question whether they really solve, or instead merely assume to be solved, the essential “correspondence problem” (Nehaniv & Dautenhahn 2002) of mapping between equivalent actions in a model and a cultural learner.”
- Recent Advances in Robot Learning from Demonstration (2020, methodology): “This type of learning, often referred to as imitation learning (3, 20), is particularly easy for the demonstrator, requiring almost no training to perform.”
- Imitation, empathy, and mirror neurons. (2009, background): “ANRV364-PS60-25 ARI 24 November 2008 18:59 literature inspired by sensory-motor models is the so-called correspondence problem (Nehaniv & Dautenhahn 2002).”
- A survey of robot learning from demonstrations for Human-Robot Collaboration (2017, background): “…in the field such as the Correspondence Problem that arise due to a mismatch between the teacher’s body configura-tion and the student’s configuration [4] and interface issue to design user friendly interfaces for demonstration (i.e., motion-capture systems [5]) in order to enable non-robotics…”
- One-Shot Imitation from Observing Humans via Domain-Adaptive Meta-Learning (2018, background): “First, the difference in appearance and morphology of the human demonstrator from the robot introduces a systematic domain shift, namely the correspondence problem [29, 6].”
- Learning concurrent motor skills in versatile solution spaces (2012, background): “However, simply replaying the demonstration typically does not solve the motor skill task as the robot is unable to exactly reproduce the teacher’s behavior, also known as correspondence problem [24], [25], or because the teacher himself could not optimally solve the task.”