Local Polynomial Regression
By J. Fox. 2000
49 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/655d8a452dc7a8cd983fb9f8b9d85c8583ac3779
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
In Statistics and Probability
- W. Kleinhans
- C. S. J. Mesonada
- Kevin Guo
- Carmen Murillo
- Stefan Sperlich
- Guillaume W. Basse
- Lijian Yang
- Liangjun Su
Citations in the corpus
- UNIFORM BAHADUR REPRESENTATION FOR LOCAL POLYNOMIAL ESTIMATES OF M-REGRESSION AND ITS APPLICATION TO THE ADDITIVE MODEL (2007, unknown): “However, the limitations of this estimator are manyfold and there are good theoretical reasons for working instead with the local polynomial class of estimators (Fan and Gijbels, 1996).”
- The Generalized Oaxaca-Blinder Estimator (2020, background): “In the survey sampling literature, that estimator is known as the generalized difference estimator (Cassel, Sarndal, and Wretman 1976; Breidt and Opsomer 2017). The idea of using fitted values in an OLS regression has also appeared before in the survey sampling community, under the name “model calib”
- Efficiency, subsidies and environmental adaptation of animal farming under CAP (2005, background): “Consistency, asymptotic theory and properties are well known and studied for the multivariate case in Ruppert and Wand (1994), for a general introduction see Fan and Gijbels (1996). If we eliminate in equation (12) the vector a1 and thus maximize only over a0, the minimizing argument is a local cons”