Satellite Image Classification via Two-Layer Sparse Coding With Biased Image Representation
By Dengxin Dai, Wen Yang. 2011
367 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Media Technology, Representation & Self-Supervised Learning, Remote Sensing
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
In Media Technology
In Representation & Self-Supervised Learning
In Remote Sensing
Citations in the corpus
- Self-Supervised Remote Sensing Feature Learning: Learning Paradigms, Challenges, and Future Works (2022, neutral): “[17], [18], [19], [20], autoencoder [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30], and deep belief networks [31].”
- Hierarchical Coding Vectors for Scene Level Land-Use Classification (2016, methodology): “A two-layer sparse coding method is used in [19].”
- Fusion of Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Land Cover Classification of High-Resolution Imagery (2017, methodology): “The RSD is a 19 class high-resolution satellite image data set [19] that was evaluated in addition to the UCM data set.”
- Land-use scene classification using multi-scale completed local binary patterns (2016, methodology): “The second dataset used in our experiments is the 19-class satellite scene dataset [23].”
- Ieee Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters Fusion of Global and Local Descriptors for Remote Sensing Image Classification (positive): “…between Gabor coefficients at different scales and the same orientation have been shown to correspond to center-surround organization (opponency) of the cells in human retina and used for texture [12] and satellite image classification [13], as well as target detection in satellite images [14].”
- Training Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Land–Cover Classification of High-Resolution Imagery (2017, methodology): “In addition to the UCM data set, we evaluated another remote sensing image data set from [20] that includes 19 land– cover classes with at least 50 images/class.”
- Scale-MAE: A Scale-Aware Masked Autoencoder for Multiscale Geospatial Representation Learning (2022, methodology): “Our analysis uses eight different land-use classification datasets: RESISC-45 [11], the UC Merced Land Use Dataset [65], AiRound and CV-BrCT [43], MLRSNet [48], EuroSAT [29], Optimal-31 [55], WHU-RS19 [14], SpaceNet v1 and v2 [53], and Functional Map of the World [12].”
- Unsupervised Deep Feature Extraction for Remote Sensing Image Classification (2015, background): “learned dictionaries for image pansharpening [34], saliencybased codes for segmentation [35], [36], sparse bag-of-words”
- AID: A Benchmark Data Set for Performance Evaluation of Aerial Scene Classification (2016, background): “- Locality-constrained Linear Coding (LLC) [85] is an effective coding scheme adapted from sparse coding methods [7, 17, 59].”
- Automatic Annotation of Satellite Images via Multifeature Joint Sparse Coding With Spatial Relation Constraint (2013, background): “If it is set to zero, our classification rule is degenerated to be the same with that of SRC and TSC. Algorithm II (Procedure of automatic annotation) Input: Feature dictionaries {Dk}Kk=1, image to be annotated I , tuning parameters λ, γ. 1.”
- Remote Sensing Image Scene Classification Using Multi-Scale Completed Local Binary Patterns and Fisher Vectors (2016, methodology): “The second dataset used in our experiments is the 19-class satellite scene dataset [29].”
- When Deep Learning Meets Metric Learning: Remote Sensing Image Scene Classification via Learning Discriminative CNNs (2018, methodology): “Typical unsupervised feature learning methods include, but not limited to, principal component analysis, k-means clustering, sparse coding [26]–[28], [33], [44] and autoencoder [29], [31].”
- Unsupervised Quaternion Feature Learning for Remote Sensing Image Classification (2016, methodology): “Sparse coding of SIFT descriptors is applied to satellite image classification in [18] and [19].”