Biological response to iron fertilization in the eastern equatorial Pacific (ironex II). I. Microplankton community abundances and biomass

By M. Landry, M. Ondrušek, S. J. Tanner, Susan L. Brown, J. Constantinou, R. Bidigare, K. Coale, S. Fitzwater. 2000

150 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/654be3004719419320f12fcfe509132bbf4207c4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Oceanography

Citations in the corpus

Biological response to iron fertilization in the eastern equatorial Pacific (IronEx II). III. Dynamics of phytoplankton growth and microzooplankton grazing (2000, unknown): “…that iron was lost from the system by vertical particle associated flux or sequestered into the growing biomass of heterotrophic bacteria (Tortell et al. 1996, Landry et al. 2000) and other pools not directly accessible to phytoplankton, growth conditions in the patch would deteriorate with time.”
Bringing physics to life at the submesoscale (2012, background): “…analyses inside iron-fertilized patches during IronEx II showed peaks and troughs of particle abundance propagating toward the larger sizes of the size spectrum over 8 days with large pennate diatoms dominating the increase in phytoplankton biomass [e.g., Coale et al., 1996; Landry et al., 2000].”
An ecosystem model of the global ocean including Fe, Si, P colimitations (2003, background): “This tight coupling between nanophytoplankton and microzooplankton is explained by similar doubling rates and is a general feature of oligotrophic and HNLC systems [ Verity et al. , 1996; Landry et al. , 2000].”
Phytoplankton processes during a mesoscale iron enrichment in the NE subarctic Pacific: Part I-Biomass and assemblage (2006, background): “Pennate diatoms have also been observed to exhibit the greatest response in other Fe enrichment experiments, particularly in IronEx II, SOIREE and SOFeX (Landry et al., 2000; Gall et al., 2001a; Coale et al., 2004).”
Co-limitation of diatoms by iron and silicic acid in the equatorial Pacific (2011, background): “…often results in enhanced phytoplankton growth and nutrient uptake in multi-day deck incubations compared to in situ rates; however, for some groups, such as the picophytoplankton, the higher light levels can be detrimental (e.g., Latasa et al., 1997; Landry et al., 2000a; Selph et al., 2011).”
Heterotrophic dinoflagellates: a significant component of microzooplankton biomass and major grazers of diatoms in the sea (2007, background): “…Pacific (italics added by us): ‘…which allows ambient diatom biomass to initially accumulate faster than ambient mesozooplankton can consume it (Landry et al. 2000),’ even though what Landry et al. (2000) actually concluded was : ‘The available data …suggest that the accumulation of diatoms…”
Growth physiology and fate of diatoms in the ocean: a review (2005, background): “In coastal, as well as open ocean environments, 45–110% of the standing stock of diatoms can be removed each day by microzooplankton grazing (Verity et al., 1996a; Nejstgaard et al., 1997; Landry et al., 2000a; Calbet, 2001; Strom et al., 2001; Olson and Strom, 2002; Suzuki et al., 2002).”
Depth-stratified phytoplankton dynamics in Cyclone Opal, a subtropical mesoscale eddy (2008, methodology): “In IronEx II, for example, there was little evidence of an iron fertilization effect on biomass or composition of cells less than 10m m( Landry et al., 2000a ), but their growth rates and physiological states were clearly stimulated (Cavender-Bares et al., 1999; Landry et al., 2000b; Mann and Chish”
Using HPLC pigment analysis to investigate phytoplankton taxonomy: the importance of knowing your species (2004, background): “However, it has also been pointed out that specific differences in the marker pigment composition within the same phytoplankton group affect the accuracy of the analysis ( Landry et al. 2000 ).”