Impulsive bees forage better: the advantage of quick, sometimes inaccurate foraging decisions
By J. G. Burns. 2005
94 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics, Insect Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/65377a133405814ea5c870ab94c041b7b2fe1e29
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
In Genetics
In Insect Science
Citations in the corpus
- Hastiness, brain size and predation regime affect the performance of wild guppies in a spatial memory task (2008, background): “Depending upon the conditions of the cognitive task, whether in the lab or in the wild, hasty individuals can make more errors but still find the reward more quickly than more cautious individuals (Dickman 1990; Burns 2005 ).”
- ‘X’ marks the spot: The possible benefits of nectar guides to bees and plants (2011, background): “If pollinator fitness depends upon maximizing the rate of nectar collection (as in social bees: Pelletier & McNeil 2003; Burns 2005), then all else being equal, they should select flowers that have shorter handling times.”
- The world from a dog's point of view (2013, unknown): “Worker bees that visit fewer flowers often carry higher pollen loads (Burns, 2005; Chittka, Dyer, Bock, & Dornhaus, 2003).”
- Speed-accuracy tradeoffs in animal decision making. (2009, background): “In such cases, an adaptive foraging strategy could be one that is fast and error prone [ 3 ,4].”