Effects of Amount of DIF, Test Length, and Purification Type on Robustness and Power of Mantel-Haenszel Procedures

By Ángel M. Fidalgo, G. Mellenbergh. 2000

57 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6527759c838932dcbfcfd56797d02b10389561c1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Wen-Chung Wang
2. Ya-Hui Su
3. Y. Yeh
4. Carol M. Woods
5. Ching-Lin Shih
6. Kevin J. Grimm

Citations in the corpus

• Effects of Anchor Item Methods on Differential Item Functioning Detection with the Likelihood Ratio Test (2003, background): “Fidalgo, Mellenbergh, and Mũniz (2000) observed that the MH procedure is robust and has sufficient power when tests contain 10% DIF items, but insufficient power occurs when tests contain 15% or 30% DIF items.”
• Factors Influencing the Mantel and Generalized Mantel-Haenszel Methods for the Assessment of Differential Item Functioning in Polytomous Items (2004, background): “However, when tests are short and the percentage of DIF items in a test is high, test purification procedures lose their efficiency (Clauser, Mazor, & Hambleton, 1993; Donoghue, Holland, & Thayer, 1993; Fidalgo et al., 2000; Holland & Thayer, 1988; Miller & Oshima, 1992).”
• Effects of Average Signed Area Between Two Item Characteristic Curves and Test Purification Procedures on the DIF Detection via the Mantel-Haenszel Method (2004, methodology): “This design was also used by Fidalgo et al. (2000).”
• Effects of Anchor Item Methods on the Detection of Differential Item Functioning Within the Family of Rasch Models (2004, unknown): “Fidalgo, Mellenbergh, and Muniz (2000) observed that the MH procedure was robust and had sufficient power when tests contained 10% DIF items, but robustness violation and insufficient power occurred when tests contained 15% or 30% DIF items.”
• Efficiency of the Mantel, Generalized Mantel–Haenszel, and Logistic Discriminant Function Analysis Methods in Detecting Differential Item Functioning for Polytomous Items (2005, methodology): “…the matching variable and thus yield more appropriate results, as long as tests are not short and the percentages of DIF items are not high (Clauser, Mazor, & Hambleton, 1993; Donoghue, Holland, & Thayer, 1993; Fidalgo et al., 2000; Holland & Thayer, 1988; M. D. Miller & Oshima, 1992).”