Low Q electrically small linear and elliptical polarized spherical dipole antennas
By S. Best. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 2005
224 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Aerospace Engineering, Electrical and Electronic Engineering
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/65262579dc8bd3985cf3a322eae89ad2628f2a36
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Aerospace Engineering
- M. A. Antoniades
- George V. Eleftheriades
- Tatsuo Itoh
- A. Erentok
- Richard W. Ziolkowski
- Christophe Caloz
- Kevin M. K. H. Leong
- M. Cismasu
In Electrical and Electronic Engineering
- Tatsuo Itoh
- George V. Eleftheriades
- M. A. Antoniades
- Mats Gustafsson
- L. Jonsson
- Richard W. Ziolkowski
- M. Cismasu
- A. Erentok
Citations in the corpus
- A Folded-Monopole Model for Electrically Small NRI-TL Metamaterial Antennas (2008, background): “to find the maximum fractional bandwidth that an antenna with the above size could attain [9]”
- Composite right/left-handed transmission line based compact resonant antennas for RF module integration (2006, background): “In addition, as shown in [10], [11] the monopole with circular disk loaded at the end or the helix dipole antenna with spiral arm can enhance the impedance bandwidth with compact size.”
- Physical Bounds and Optimal Currents on Antennas (2012, background): “The considered current densities are similar to the current densities on folded spherical dipoles, capped spherical dipoles [11], and folded spherical helix [12] antennas.”
- Metamaterial-based efficient electrically small antennas (2006, background): “There have been a wide variety of recent approaches to achieve this goal including clever packing of resonant antenna elements into this small volume using natural geometrical configurations [12]–[15], fractal curve antennas [20]–[23] and space-filling curve antennas [24]–[27].”