Assessing the impact of the EU ETS using firm level data
By J. Abrell, A. Faye, G. Zachmann. 2011
194 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6515ede77b5e6455c6dc8f847ea3550fb045af9d
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Antoine Dechezleprêtre
- Eugénie Joltreau
- Frédéric Branger
- Misato Sato
- Katrin Sommerfeld
- Julien Chevallier
- Philippe Quirion
- Suk Joon Byun
Citations in the corpus
- Why does emissions trading under the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS) not affect firms’ competitiveness? Empirical findings from the literature (2018, background): “Abrell et al. (2011) empirically analyse manufacturing firms across the entire EU comparing regulated firms to firms from all non-regulated sectors. Their results show no statistically significant effects of the EU ETS on firms’ value added or profit margins. Still, for employment they detect a smal”
- Did the EU ETS Make a Difference? An Empirical Assessment Using Lithuanian Firm-Level Data (2016, unknown): “Finally, Abrell, Faye, and Zachmann (2011), use CITL data to test whether the EU ETS induced acceleration in emissions reductions, and find some evidence to the positive.”
- The Impacts of Environmental Regulations on Competitiveness (2017, background): “Abrell et al. (2011) also found ambiguous impacts on employment in the cement sector.”
- Carbon Leakage and Competitiveness of Cement and Steel Industries Under the EU ETS: Much Ado About Nothing (2016, methodology): “Zachman et al. (2011), using firm level panel data and a matching procedure between regulated and unregulated firms, found no evidence that the ETS affected companies’ profits.”