The index of relative importance: an alternative approach to reducing bias in descriptive studies of animal diets

By R. Hart, M. Calver, Chris R. Dickman. 2002

92 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6515332c0f132e921a3386972fd97c597bf0f6d0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecological Modeling

1. R. Baker
2. Marcus Sheaves
3. A. Buckland

In Ecology

1. A. Buckland
2. R. Baker
3. Marcus Sheaves
4. A. Whitfield
5. I. Nagelkerken
6. S. Bouillon
7. K. Abrantes

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. A. Buckland
2. Marcus Sheaves
3. R. Baker

Citations in the corpus

• Fish gut content analysis: robust measures of diet composition (2014, background): “The compound indices developed by fish biologists have also been promoted for use by terrestrial ecologists to overcome the biases of the particular emphasis of individual metrics of gut composition (Hart et al. 2002).”