Comparison of different probabilistic methods for predicting stability of a slope in spatially variable c–φ soil

149 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A multiple response-surface method for slope reliability analysis considering spatial variability of soil properties (2015, methodology): “In the literature (Haldar and Sivakumar Babu, 2009; Srivastava et al., 2010; Suchomel and Mašin, 2010; Kasama et al., 2012; Wu et al., 2012), the Cholesky decomposition technique has been widely used to discretize random fields of soil properties because it is conceptually simple and easily…”
Response surface methods for slope reliability analysis: Review and comparison (2016, methodology): “Many reliability methods have been proposed for slope reliability analysis in literature, such as the first-order second moment method (FOSM) (e.g., Christian et al., 1994; Hassan and Wolff, 1999; Duncan, 2000; Xue and Gavin, 2007; Suchomel and Mašin, 2010), first-order reliability method (FORM) (e.”