A Dynamic Process Model for Finding Informants and Gaining Access in Qualitative Research

By Amanda Peticca‐Harris, Nadia deGama, S. Elias. 2016

110 citations recorded by the source corpus.

This article surfaces some of the emotional encounters that may be experienced while trying to gain access and secure informants in qualitative research. Using the children’s game of hopscotch as a metaphor, we develop a dynamic, nonlinear process model of gaining access yielding four elements: study formulation with plans to move forward, identifying potential informants, contacting informants, and interacting with informants during data collection. Underlying each element of the process is the potential for researchers to re-strategize their approach or exit the study. Autobiographical stories about gaining access for our PhD dissertation research are used to flesh out each element of the process, including the challenges we experienced with each element and how we addressed them. We conclude by acknowledging limitations to our study and suggest future and continued areas of research.

Subfields: Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/64ce7336b19bba32fc7cb9c2bae81c4eadb7c4e9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. S. Stenger
2. M. Gill
3. D. Gill
4. Thomas J. Roulet

Citations in the corpus

• Reconsidering the Value of Covert Research (2017, background): “…Research Methods 20(3) Getting In: False Identities and Real Skills As Berlin (1995, p. 381) stated of covert participant observation, “one of the key methodological challenges in field research is gaining access to organizations” (see also Cunliffe & Alcadipani, 2016; Peticca-Harris et al., 2016).”