Readability: An Appraisal of Research and Application

By J. Chall. 2012

90 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/64c4e763433d0e1f7db695fd96b19c7c0a0b4b4c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Verena Rieser
2. David M. Howcroft
3. Miruna Clinciu
4. Simon Mille
5. Anya Belz
6. Ondrej Dusek
7. Sebastian Gehrmann
8. Sashank Santhanam

Citations in the corpus

• Annual report readability and corporate agency costs (2018, methodology): “According to Loughran and McDonald (2014) and the measurements of Li (2008) and De Franco et al. (2015), we take the length of Chinese annual reports to measure their readability.”
• Twenty Years of Confusion in Human Evaluation: NLG Needs Evaluation Sheets and Standardised Definitions (2020, background): “For example, there is a long history of studying readability (Chall, 1958; De Clercq et al., 2014).”