Stigma toward individuals engaged in consensual nonmonogamy: Robust and worthy of additional research.
By A. Moors, Jes L. Matsick, Ali Ziegler, Jennifer D. Rubin, Terri D. Conley. 2013
120 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/64bd89eaab72b6d13fa26be24d78201092962e9d
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Clinical Psychology
In Social Psychology
- Jes L. Matsick
- Robin S. Edelstein
- William J. Chopik
- Jennifer D. Rubin
- A. Moors
- Terri D. Conley
- H. Schechinger
- Ali Ziegler
In Sociology and Political Science
- A. Moors
- Jes L. Matsick
- William J. Chopik
- Jennifer D. Rubin
- Terri D. Conley
- H. Schechinger
- Ali Ziegler
Citations in the corpus
- Unique and shared relationship benefits of consensually non-monogamous and monogamous relationships: A review and insights for moving forward. (2017, background): “Even in circumstances when people in CNM were portrayed as happy and satisfied with their relationship, they were still stigmatized (Moors et al., 2013).”
- Love and sex: polyamorous relationships are perceived more favourably than swinging and open relationships (2014, background): “Prior research demonstrates that people overwhelmingly perceive CNM relationships less positively than monogamous relationships (Conley et al., 2012; Moors et al., 2013).”
- Attached to monogamy? Avoidance predicts willingness to engage (but not actual engagement) in consensual non-monogamy (2015, background): “…is generally perceived as the most natural and optimal form of romantic partnering in Western cultures (Conley, Moors, et al., 2013; Conley, Ziegler, et al., 2012; Moors et al., 2013; Perel, 2006), truly monogamous practices are nonnormative in the majority of the world’s societies (Schmitt, 2005).”