The Use of Special Items to Manage Earnings and Perceptions
By Michael R. Kinney. 2000
114 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/64a6c9e88df9435869eb4452592893ebb32675f7
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Denise A. Jones
- K. J. Smith
- Yun Fan
- Abhijit Barua
- William M. Cready
- Christine I Wiedman
- Wayne B. Thomas
- Tony Kang
Citations in the corpus
- A cross-country study on the effects of national culture on earnings management (2010, background): “Our study also moves from the individual decision level to the individual group level, as recommended by Kirkman et al. (2006). Finally, the study adds representation from international accounting with a market approach, an area long neglected in the international business literature.”
- Earnings Management Using Classification Shifting: an Examination of Core Earnings and Special Items (2006, unknown): “For example, Kinney and Trezevant (1997) show that managers are far more likely to break out incomedecreasing special items than income-increasing special items on the face of the income statement, consistent with managers wishing to highlight the transitory nature of expenses, but not income.”
- Managing Earnings Using Classification Shifting: Evidence from Quarterly Special Items (2010, background): “McVay (2006) investigates a third form of earnings management.”
- Limited Attention, Information Disclosure, and Financial Reporting (2003, unknown): “…managers use special items in the attempt to manage stock prices and market perceptions of firm performance (see, e.g., Elliott and Hanna, 1996; Kinney and Trezevant, 1997), and that reporting of special items has increased over time (see Collins et al., 1997; Elliott and Hanna, 1996; Bradshaw…”
- How are Earnings Managed? An Examination of Specific Accruals (2004, background): “8 In a similar vein, Kinney and Trezevant (1997) find evidence of special items being used to smooth unusually high or unusually low earnings.”
- Comparing the Value Relevance, Predictive Value, and Persistence of Other Comprehensive Income and Special Items (2011, background): “…realized gains and losses from the sale of assets and investments, unrealized impairment write-offs, and realized or unrealized restructuring charges, merger costs, settlements, and other accrued items (Elliott and Hanna 1996; Kinney and Trezevant 1997; Bradshaw and Sloan 2002; Cready et al. 2010).”
- Signaling Firm Performance Through Financial Statement Presentation: An Analysis Using Special Items* : Financial Statement Presentation (2009, unknown): “In addition, NSI is positive and significant (coefficient = 0.122, tstatistic = 4.24), indicating that ceteris paribus managers are more likely to present negative special items separately on the income statement than positive special items (e.g., Kinney and Trezevant 1997).”