Analytic mappings between noncommutative pencil balls

By J. William Helton, Igor Klep, Scott McCullough. 2009

62 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Abstract In this paper, we analyze problems involving matrix variables for which we use a noncommutative algebra setting. To be more specific, we use a class of functions (called NC analytic functions) defined by power series in noncommuting variables and evaluate these functions on sets of matrices of all dimensions; we call such situations dimension-free. These types of functions have recently been used in the study of dimension-free linear system engineering problems (Helton et al. (2009) [10] , de Oliviera et al. (2009) [8] ). In the earlier paper (Helton et al. (2009) [9] ) we characterized NC analytic maps that send dimension-free matrix balls to dimension-free matrix balls and carry the boundary to the boundary; such maps we call “NC ball maps”. In this paper we turn to a more general dimension-free ball B L , called a “pencil ball”, associated with a homogeneous linear pencil L ( x ) : = A 1 x 1 + ⋯ + A g x g , A j ∈ C d ′ × d . For X = col ( X 1 , … , X g ) ∈ ( C n × n ) g , define L ( X ) : = ∑ A j ⊗ X j and let B L : = ( { X ∈ ( C n × n ) g : ‖ L ( X ) ‖ 1 } ) n ∈ N . We study the generalization of NC ball maps to these pencil balls B L , and call them “pencil ball maps”. We show that every B L has a minimal dimensional (in a certain sense) defining pencil L ˜ . Up to normalization, a pencil ball map is the direct sum of L ˜ with an NC analytic map of the pencil ball into the ball. That is, pencil ball maps are simple, in contrast to the classical result of D'Angelo (1993) [7, Chapter 5] showing there is a great variety of such analytic maps from C g to C m when g ≪ m . To prove our main theorem, this paper uses the results of our previous paper (Helton et al. (2009) [9] ) plus entirely different techniques, namely, those of completely contractive maps. What we do here is a small piece of the bigger puzzle of understanding how Linear Matrix Inequalities (LMIs) behave with respect to noncommutative change of variables.

Subfields: Algebra and Number Theory, Applied Mathematics, Mathematical Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6496c5bcbe2c1453537676a3b24a90933a641313

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Algebra and Number Theory

  1. Joseph A. Ball
  2. Gregory Marx
  3. John E. McCarthy
  4. Jim Agler
  5. Victor Vinnikov
  6. Dmitry S. Kaliuzhnyi-Verbovetskyi
  7. Greg Knese

In Applied Mathematics

  1. Victor Vinnikov
  2. Joseph A. Ball
  3. Gregory Marx
  4. Jim Agler
  5. John E. McCarthy
  6. Dmitry S. Kaliuzhnyi-Verbovetskyi
  7. Orr Shalit
  8. Guy Salomon

In Mathematical Physics

  1. Joseph A. Ball
  2. Gregory Marx
  3. Victor Vinnikov
  4. Jim Agler
  5. John E. McCarthy
  6. Dmitry S. Kaliuzhnyi-Verbovetskyi
  7. Orr Shalit
  8. Gelu Popescu

Citations in the corpus