Cues to food location that domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) of different ages do and do not use

By B. Agnetta, Brian Hare, Michael Tomasello. Animal Cognition, 2000

265 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Genetics, Pharmacy, Small Animals

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6468e0436562ec311d8ad5843a7036ca56ee925f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Genetics

In Pharmacy

In Small Animals

Citations in the corpus

The use of human-given cues by domestic horses, Equus caballus, during an object choice task (2010, background): “Their ability to use a wide variety of cues from the first trial (Miklósi et al. 1998; Agnetta et al. 2000; Miklósi & Soproni 2006) and the fact that they distinguish between situations in which a person is looking at a target object and ones in which they are looking above the target object…”
Domestic dogs are sensitive to a human's perspective (2009, background): “(Hare et al., 1998; Miklosi et al., 1998; Agnetta et al., 2000).”
Visual perspective taking in dogs (Canis familiaris) in the presence of barriers (2004, unknown): “These skills are independent of the age of the tested dogs ( Agnetta et al., 2000) and human contact ( Hare et al.”
The world from a dog's point of view (2013, unknown): “a visual marker cue where the dog does not see the marker’s placement), task performance using social cues is consistently found to be superior (Agnetta et al., 2000; Udell, Giglio, et al., 2008). The relative saliency of social cues holds even when nonsocial cues provide direct evidence of the rewa”
Interpreting Scientific and Engineering Practices: Integrating the cognitive, social, and cultural dimensions (2003, background): “…lying in a uniquely human ability to understand conspecifics as intentional beings (recent work shows other primates and dogs might also possess the ability (Agnetta, Hare, and Tomasello 2000; Tomasello, Call, and Hare 1998)), humans are unique in the way they pass on and build upon culture.”
Effects of breed, sex, and neuter status on trainability in dogs (2005, background): “Recent experimental studies have confirmed that domestic dogs exhibit heightened sensitivity and responsiveness to human social cues and communication signals, and that they perform consistently better than either hand-reared wolves or chimpanzees on human-guided tasks ( Agnetta, Hare and Tomasello ”
Attachment to humans: a comparative study on hand-reared wolves and differently socialized dog puppies (2005, unknown): “13 03–3472/05/$30.00/0 2005 The Association for the S Topál et al. 1997; Naderi et al. 2001, 2002; social learning: Kubinyi et al. 2003; Pongrácz et al. 2003a, b; communication: Miklósi et al. 1998, 2000; Agnetta et al. 2001; Soproni et al. 2001, 2002).”
Human-directed gazing behaviour in puppies and adult dogs, Canis lupus familiaris (2011, background): “…by results showing that: (1) dog pups as young as 6 weeks of age can already use a variety of human communicative cues to locate hidden food (Agnetta et al. 2000; Hare et al. 2002; Riedel et al. 2008; Dorey et al. 2010); (2) compared to other domesticated species dogs show a greater…”
The domestication hypothesis for dogs' skills with human communication: a response to Udell et al. (2008) and Wynne et al. (2008) (2010, background): “Publishe puppies and must be explicitly trained to express dog-like skills in response to human communicative cues (Agnetta et al. 2000; Hare et al. 2002; Viranyi et al. 2008).”
Breed Differences in Domestic Dogs' (Canis familiaris) Comprehension of Human Communicative Signals (2009, methodology): “Bowls were always baited in full view of the subjects, both in test and control conditions, as performed in previous studies of this type (Agnetta et al 2000, Hare et al 1998).”