Thermal adaptation of Arctic charr: experimental studies of growth in eleven charr populations from Sweden, Norway and Britain
By S. Larsson, Torbjørn Forseth, I. Berglund, A. J. Jensen, I. Näslund, J. M. Elliott, B. Jonsson. 2005
123 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Aquatic Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/644ab2cc7e65b957b9a8df1bb4681d846dfb33e4
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Aquatic Science
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
Citations in the corpus
- Size and temperature dependent foraging capacities and metabolism: consequences for winter starvation mortality in fish (2006, methodology): “For details on parameter values in the model and calculations see Byström et al. (2004) and Larsson et al. (2005).”
- Competitive exclusion along climate gradients: energy efficiency influences the distribution of two salmonid fishes (2011, methodology): “To parameterize models for thermal scaling of physiological parameters of the two species, a series of thermal growth performance experiments were conducted (Larsson et al., 2005; Forseth et al., 2009).”
- Comparative Thermal Requirements of Westslope Cutthroat Trout and Rainbow Trout: Implications for Species Interactions and Development of Thermal Protection Standards (2007, background): “Alternatively, growth differences could be attributable to physiological differences among rainbow trout strains, although evidence of distinctive strain or stock differences in thermal tolerance and performance in fishes remains inconclusive (Myrick and Cech 2000, 2004; Imsland et al. 2001; Larsson”
- Spatial and temporal scales of adaptive divergence in marine fishes and the implications for conservation (2006, background): “Although CnGV is not universal (Malloy & Targett, 1994; Lahti et al., 2001; Lankford & Targett, 2001; Larsson et al., 2005), its commonality attests to the broad significance of this form of adaptive divergence.”
- Substitution of top predators: effects of pike invasion in a subarctic lake (2007, background): “Optimal temperature for maximum growth is 15 and 21 C for char and pike, respectively and preferred temperature is 11 C for char whereas for pike the preferred temperature is 2–3 C above the temperature for maximum growth (Casselman, 1996; Larsson, 2005; Larsson et al., 2005).”
- The marine temperature and depth preferences of Arctic charr (Salvelinus alpinus) and sea trout (Salmo trutta), as recorded by data storage tags (2007, background): “The upper thermal limits for survival are about 3 C higher for brown trout than for Arctic charr in fresh water, otherwise, their thermal limits for growth and feeding may be similar (Baroudy and Elliott, 1994; Elliott and Baroudy, 1995; Lyytikäinen et al., 1997; Thyrel et al., 1999; Elliott and Kle”