Update on CRUST1.0 - A 1-degree Global Model of Earth's Crust

By G. Laske, G. Masters, Zhitu Ma, M. Pasyanos. 2013

1,605 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Detailed rupture imaging of the 25 April 2015 Nepal earthquake using teleseismic P waves (2015, background): “6 km/s, which is faster than the local S wave velocity [Laske et al., 2013].”
Global dynamic topography observations reveal limited influence of large-scale mantle flow (2016, unknown): “0 database assuming constant lithospheric thickness of 125 km [9]; red line = as before but using variable lithospheric thickness [10]; blue line = as before where lithosphere thicker than 175 km is depleted by 10 kg m−3; green line = as before with depletion of 30 kg m−3.”
Fast nonlinear gravity inversion in spherical coordinates with application to the South American Moho (2017, methodology): “0 sediment model (Laske et al. 2013) used to correct our gravity data.”
Global adjoint tomography: first-generation model (2016, unknown): “0 (Laske et al. 2013) with 1◦ × 1◦ resolution.”
TX2019slab: A New P and S Tomography Model Incorporating Subducting Slabs (2019, methodology): “The fast velocity anomalies in our previous S wave tomography at the shallowest depths (Lu & Grand, 2016) are used to determine the location of cratons if they have Archean or Proterozoic crust (Laske et al., 2013).”
Savani: A variable resolution whole‐mantle model of anisotropic shear velocity variations based on multiple data sets (2014, background): “0 [Laske et al., 2013] varies spatially over the entire globe, with 1◦×◦ resolution.”