On the Representation Dimension of Finite Dimensional Algebras

52 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Radical embeddings and representation dimension (2002, background): “R T ] 2 3 O ct DEDICATED TO THE MEMORY OF SHEILA BRENNER”
On the finitistic dimension conjecture, III: Related to the pair eAe⊆A (2008, methodology): “For representation dimension, we refer to [2,4,10, 28 ,31,32] and the references therein.”
On the representation dimension of tilted and laura algebras (2006, methodology): “The interest in the representation dimension was recently revived by works of Xi [25, 26] and also because of its relationship with the finitistic and the Nakayama conjectures: it was shown by Igusa and Todorov in [18] that if the representation dimension of an algebra is at most 3, then its finitis”
On the finitistic dimension conjecture I: related to representation-finite algebras (2004, background): “... k is a perfect fleld (for example, a flnite fleld, or a flled of characteristic zero, or an algebraically closed fleld) then we can drop simply the assumption that B=rad(B) and C=rad(C) are splitting semi-simple k-algebras in Proposition 3.10 and Proposition 3.11 since if B is representation-fln”